HTHA Detection & Annex E API 941

Materials Science, Metallurgy, Welding, NDTs, Reliability Assessment, Failure Analysis, etc.
Post Reply
octane
Posts: 155
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 15:38
Area of interest: Mechanical Engineering

HTHA Detection & Annex E API 941

Post by octane »

As per Annex E of API 941, Velocity Ratio Ultrasonic method has the detection capability of not only detecting fissures in base metal away from weldments but also differentiate between HTHA damage and plate laminations. What successful commercial techniques are available to meet this?
2) Why spectral analysis and backscatter could not differentiate between laminations and HTHA damage?
irish
Posts: 106
Joined: 27 Nov 2010, 09:04
Area of interest: Mechanical Engineering

Re: HTHA Detection & Annex E API 941

Post by irish »

That's right but practically what's happening is application of combining advanced UT imaging & physics-based analysis. That is where Advanced backscatter comes in.
HTHA would be distributed microfissuring + methane voids however laminations would be planar reflectors. That is where the difference gets picked.
Commercially you can check with Eddyfi, Zetec, Olympus systems.
novice123
Posts: 127
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 18:32
Area of interest: Petroleum Engineering

Re: HTHA Detection & Annex E API 941

Post by novice123 »

novice123
Posts: 127
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 18:32
Area of interest: Petroleum Engineering

Re: HTHA Detection & Annex E API 941

Post by novice123 »

There is a basic core issue why spectral analysis and backscatter could not differentiate between lamination and hydrogen attack as both defects affect ultrasonic energy in similar ways.
Spectral analysis looks at frequency dependent attenuation which both damages reflect.
Backscatter focuses on energy scattered which happens again in both the damages.
Post Reply