Online welding of piping - Burn through thickness

Materials Science, Metallurgy, Welding, NDTs, Reliability Assessment, Failure Analysis, etc.
Post Reply
octane
Posts: 155
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 15:38
Area of interest: Mechanical Engineering

Online welding of piping - Burn through thickness

Post by octane »

To avoid burn through, there has been different values listed for the piping thickness before an online welding is performed, based upon piping content state.
What's the reason of having these two different values?
mechcolor
Posts: 293
Joined: 17 May 2010, 18:05
Area of interest: Manufacturing Engineering

Re: Online welding of piping - Burn through thickness

Post by mechcolor »

The contents of the pipe act as a cooling medium. The rate at which they carry heat away from the weld zone dictates the risk of the pipe wall reaching its melting point.
Gas/Vapor (Higher Thickness Requirement): Gases are poor conductors of heat and have low heat capacity. They do not "quench" the weld zone effectively. Because the heat stays concentrated in the pipe wall for longer, there is a much higher risk of the inner surface reaching the melting point. Therefore, a thicker "buffer" of metal is required to ensure the inner wall stays structural.
Liquids (Lower Thickness Requirement): Liquids (especially moving liquids) have high thermal conductivity and heat capacity. They act as an efficient heat sink, rapidly pulling heat away from the internal surface. This cooling effect prevents the inner wall from reaching the melting temperature as easily, allowing for a slightly thinner minimum wall thickness.

While state (liquid vs. gas) is the primary divider, the velocity of the content also plays a role.
Static or Low Flow: Increases burn-through risk because the heat isn't being "carried away" by new, cool molecules.
High Flow: Reduces burn-through risk but increases the risk of hydrogen cracking (cold cracking). Because the liquid cools the weld so fast, it can create a brittle grain structure (martensite) in the heat-affected zone (HAZ).
ben
Posts: 242
Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 03:11
Area of interest: Mechanical Engineering

Re: Online welding of piping - Burn through thickness

Post by ben »

The engineering challenge is that with too Thin: The inner wall melts, causing a catastrophic release (Burn-through), and with too much cooling (Liquid): The weld cools too fast, causing cracks (Hydrogen Cracking)
octane
Posts: 155
Joined: 08 Oct 2010, 15:38
Area of interest: Mechanical Engineering

Re: Online welding of piping - Burn through thickness

Post by octane »

Thanks.
mechcolor wrote: 21 Mar 2026, 09:37 The contents of the pipe act as a cooling medium. The rate at which they carry heat away from the weld zone dictates the risk of the pipe wall reaching its melting point.
Gas/Vapor (Higher Thickness Requirement): Gases are poor conductors of heat and have low heat capacity. They do not "quench" the weld zone effectively. Because the heat stays concentrated in the pipe wall for longer, there is a much higher risk of the inner surface reaching the melting point. Therefore, a thicker "buffer" of metal is required to ensure the inner wall stays structural.
Liquids (Lower Thickness Requirement): Liquids (especially moving liquids) have high thermal conductivity and heat capacity. They act as an efficient heat sink, rapidly pulling heat away from the internal surface. This cooling effect prevents the inner wall from reaching the melting temperature as easily, allowing for a slightly thinner minimum wall thickness.

While state (liquid vs. gas) is the primary divider, the velocity of the content also plays a role.
Static or Low Flow: Increases burn-through risk because the heat isn't being "carried away" by new, cool molecules.
High Flow: Reduces burn-through risk but increases the risk of hydrogen cracking (cold cracking). Because the liquid cools the weld so fast, it can create a brittle grain structure (martensite) in the heat-affected zone (HAZ).
Post Reply